Home PPGIS/PGIS books P3DM Where? P3DM Video Site Map Search Contact us  

P3DM and Terrain Elevation Models for Conflict Management

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home
P3DM Rationale
About P3DM
About Participation
P3DM Application (1)
P3DM Application (2)
P3DM Application (3)
P3DM Application (4)
P3DM Application (5)
P3DM Application (6)
P3DM Application (7)
P3DM Application (8)
P3DM Application (9)
P3DM Application (10)
Virtual Library
Media Collection
Annotated Literature
Mapping Toolbox
Links - Participation
Links - Technical
Tips 4 Practitioners
Eldis database
FAQ on P3DM
News Updates
PGIS glossary
Notice Board
Services
Legislation
About Us
About the author
What's New
Link to us
PGIS training
Funding opportunities
Grantmaking
3D maps in history
Development Partners
Disclaimer

 


 

This page was
last updated on:
March 06, 2008

 

 

 

Balbalan case study Lagawe case study

   

 

Terrain elevation models virtual and physical have been successfully used in the context of conflict management. Specifically the use of participatory 3D models integrated with Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has been successfully adopted in the Philippines by the Office of the Presidential Advisor on the Peace Process (OPAPP) to address inter-tribal territorial disputes.

By creating shared vantage points and offering a common visual vocabulary, 3D models and derived maps are instrumental in bridging communication barriers, facilitating dialogue and limiting subjective interpretations, thus setting the basis for fruitful negotiations.

Bridging Communication Barriers By Offering a Shared Perspective and Visual Language

Different opinions are frequently based on different perspectives and the quality of the media used to communicate. When a process is geared towards addressing conflicts bound to the territory, appropriate communication channels are essential to grant all parties equal access to information in order to develop a common understanding of the issues at stake. Case in point is the so-called bird’s eye view offered by a scaled relief model through which a viewer acquires a holistic view of the landscape wherein landmarks and salient features are equally visible to everyone. In addition when language barriers represent a constraint, information exchange best occurs via visual communication means based on colors, shape and texture, like in a 3D model.
 

   

Bibliographic references - Community mapping and conflict management

 

bullet

Giacomo Rambaldi, Sahlee Bugna, Angela Tiangco and Dave de Vera. 2002. Bringing the Vertical Dimension to the Negotiating Table. Preliminary Assessment of a Conflict Resolution Case in the Philippines [803 KB | 10 pages]. ASEAN Biodiversity, Vol. 2 No. 1, 17-26. ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity Conservation (ARCBC), Los Baños, Philippines. [PDF, 803 KB, 10 pages]

bullet

Srimongkontip, S. .2000. Building the capacity of watershed networks to resolve natural resource conflicts: Field experiences from the CARE Thailand Project. Asia-Pacific Community Forestry Newsletter, vol. 13:2

bullet

Wood B. William. 2000. GIS as a Tool for Territorial Negotiations. IBRU Boundary and Security Bulletin. Vol. 8 No. 3:72-78 [134 KB; 8 pages]

bullet

Johnson, R. 1999. Negotiating the Dayton Peace Accords through Digital Maps, United States Institute of Peace (USIP) Virtual Diplomacy Report, 25 February 1999.

bullet

Miguel Chacon. 2003. Principles of PPGIS for Land Conflict Resolution in Guatemala. Geography Department, UCGIS Summer Assembly 2003.

bullet

Dana, Peter H. 1998. Nicaragua’s “GPSistas”: Mapping Their Lands on the Caribbean Coast. GPS World. Pages 32-41

bullet

Stauffacher, Drake, Currion, Steinberger. 2005. Information and Communication Technology for Peace: The role of ICT in preventing, responding to and recovering from conflict, United Nations, ICT Task Force

bullet

Kwaku Kyem P.A. 2004. Of Intractable Conflicts and Participatory GIS Applications: The Search for Consensus amidst Competing Claims and Institutional Demands . Annals of the Association of American Geographers, March 2004, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 37-57(21) Blackwell Publishing

bullet

Carsten Keßler, Marion Wilde, Martin Raubal. 2005. Using Sdi-Based Public Participation for Conflict Resolution. Institute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Germany

bullet

Jennifer L. Jones. 2005. Transboundary Conservation in Southern Africa: Exploring conflict between local resource access and conservation; Centre for Environmental Studies University of Pretoria South Africa

bullet

Selection of recommended books on Conflict and Natural Resources

 

Back to Top

See the Process

 
Hit Counter

Back Home Next